![]() Now, can we consider these features low level? I guess that one could include a strong type system, but it doesn't seem necessary to me, at least according to some of the earliest languages categorized as such. The usual ways are function composition and closure. I implicitly gave my definition of such language as being one support functions as first class values - ie, the ability to produce these values dynamically. There was a similarly themed question in r/compsci regarding C being or not a functional language. The first question is: what is a functional language at its core? Once we've defined it, we may answer your questions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |